I have gotten pretty frustrated with people's logic on here and apologize for calling you a bootlicker. This thread is NOT about non compliant E-Bikes on trails. That's all I'm trying to say. I'm against illegal E-Bikes on trails and infrastructure as well.
It's not a civil debate when you respond with nonsensical points about illegal E-Bikes. Like I said, go start a thread about illegal E-Bikes on trails. What you are saying has nothing to do with the topic.
So more evidence that the 3-Class has just created confusion in interstate commerce? That makes 6 different standards now. I'm sure the industry and manufacturers love that. Thanks for adding to the argument. Keep licking Asher.
Again, this is not about trail access. A Bike = E-Bike. They would have to ban ALL bikes. Your argument is ridiculous. The DOI has already ruled on this. You know this and are being disingenuous as usual.
It was delayed for a reason. Why would he sponsor a bill that had wording that didn't quality his own state??? I have the original version, and when the bill is tabled again, you will have seen the change.
"bike lobby/advocates"
Do you mean a privately funded industry organisation, that's not democratically elected, paying themselves $150,000 plus in industry money from companies that are in competition with E-Bike technology? Is that what you mean?
Ok, I guess we shall see what the CPSC decides. This is really out of everyones power now. Someone would have eventually petirioned them, I'm assuming industry would have, because 6 different standards now exist in the country. Thanks for the respose. :)
Exactly, if you have a throttle OR pedelec on the CPSC definition it doesn't provide more power than needed to maintain 20mph. I'm not sure why so many people are talking about legal E-Bikes throttling up to 30+mph??? I honestly believe people are confusing offroad E-Bikes which are not allowed...