It depends on which Creo you're using as a comparison. Carbon Creos weigh around 28 pounds, sans pedals, but the aluminum Creo is very close to the weight of the aluminum Vado SL.The weight difference between Creo to Vado SL is about the same as Vado SL to Vado.
That is an expensive 3 lbs.Aluminum Creo weighs 33 lbs with pedals - that come with bike
Carbon one weighs 29lbs. Vado SL weighs at 36lbs
Look closely, they’re different bikes.That is an expensive 3 lbs.
It was a joke. They are totally different bikes, and I expect everyone reading this thread probably knows that. But the price difference is not a joke.Look closely, they’re different bikes.
The expression isn't just about racing. When I was writing code, I used it all the time. I could knock out something that "usually works" in a few hours, but tested and debugged, and ready for an untrained user could take many days and much more money. I think building contractors and designers have the same issue. It's a complex world...
Specialized shows the carbon version at 26.7, though that's probably the top of the line. However, the EVO version is still under 30lbs. The carbon comp (non evo) is probably somewhere in between.Aluminum Creo weighs 33 lbs with pedals - that come with bike
Carbon one weighs 29lbs. Vado SL weighs at 36lbs
For me, it would be purely politics. It's a one party state and things are being done without discussion. They'll raise the taxes when they feel like it and re-allocate funds without hesitation. I'm paying more and not getting more. As the day wears on, I feel more abandoned. I'd rather take my money and go somewhere else when I'll be more welcomed.I have always loved San Diego and thought of how great it would be to live there. But I've only been to California on vacation. I have read lots of Californians have been leaving the state. What's driving people to leave?
Thanks for providing that enlightening article on the state of crisis that Californians face. It's a wake-up call for those of us who aren't directly exposed to the issues. I guess with all of the spectacular images posted on this site by those of you from the Golden State it's hard to fathom anything else but a blissful setting.Here is a short list below... I'm a native of this beautiful state and not planning to leave anytime soon.
Unfortunately, the State is only now affordable for those at the top or bottom of the socioeconomic scale.
California is a failed state. How do we know? They're moving to Arizona in droves.
You can't blame Californians for moving to Arizona. But let's hope they leave behind the progressive policies that ruined their state.www.usatoday.com
From what I gather, the calories are calculated based on the total output from the power meter, regardless of assist mode.Does anyone know: When using the Creo motor, do the calories shown on a Garmin reflect only the rider effort, or include the motor input? BTW, my Garmin "knows" I am using an e-bike and what power setting I am on. Thank you.
My Comp Evo in XL was about 30,5 lbs with tubes and without pedals. Tubless and without a carbon seat post instead of the dropper post you get around 29,5. With good/strong (gravel) wheels and carbon rims you get below 29. With better components regardless of money you can save another lbs, so 28 lbs is (without pedals) reachable for a still usable gravel bike. If you are a light rider and with lighter tires one pound more is possible, so 27 lbs. If you through away gravel and just go for roads maybe 26 lbs. If speciliazed would offer the futureshock optional (I like it, but I guess some road bikers would prefer a lighter Creo without it) maybe 25 lbs.Specialized shows the carbon version at 26.7, though that's probably the top of the line. However, the EVO version is still under 30lbs. The carbon comp (non evo) is probably somewhere in between.
I’ve put a few miles in on WTB Riddlers 700x45c. I Would advise to use only for super dry conditions as you have zero mud clearance. But they fit.Who else is using the Creo for Gravel?
What's the widest tire you were able to fit in? Specialized says 42mm, but I would like some real life experiences. I now have 40-622 G-One Allround on a rim width 23mm inner width and would like more grip and width. It seems, 42mm is possible in the rear but noch much more, in the front is a little bit more space.