Search results

Being upset about the "truth" on your part does not make the telling of the same factual truth trolling no more than it makes a fact false. You are trying to shut down critical thinking. The fact is that a death occurred on a Sondors (as was predicted here prior to thousands being sold on the...

Ebike and bicycles are covered by "strict liability." I would argue that Sondors is responsible in full or in part. Under strict liability the lack of documentation might be all that would be required to prove fault in part to sondors. Sondors never defined how the product should " be...

Sondors is a "judgement" proof company without depth or product liability insurance. The sale has been structured as to prevent owners from finding financial recourse. Additionally Sondors is engaged in a lawsuit for non-payment to one of his key vendors. There may be significant danger...

And there is a litany of complaints on Indigogo as well as Kickstarter. The fact a DEATH occured is factual The fact there is no recourse is factual I agree with George build your own bike and accept the responsiblity for doing so.

Actually that is the way the tort law is practiced and works; All Parties in the Chain of Distribution As a general principle, you want to include any and all parties involved in the chain of distribution (the path that the product takes from manufacture to distribution to the customers) of the...

I know small bike shops and manufacturer-importers (including Big Cat) that do the right thing and pony up for product liability insurance. They are providing PL because it is the right thing to do both for consumers and for the longevity of a company. Companies that don't have PL should be...

This industry operates under the theory of STRICT LIABILITY. Under this legal theory this means that a bike manufacturer will be held responsible under a very wide variety of circumstances. The lack of documentation from Sondors makes the scope even greater. A manufacturer would have...

1) Sondors lacks the financial depth of many ebike manufacturers - No recourse --cost savings to him, risk to you 2) Sondors lacks product liability insurance and is judgement proof - No recourse --cost savings to him, risk to you There are other ebikes that will be far far safer than Sondors...

Sorry mate, (I am FTC complaint btw, not sockpuppet-ing here) bottom line I saw this coming from a mile away.

"the man then lost control of the eBike and was ejected onto the pavement as a result of the collision." I have seen failed electrical systems on ebikes whereby the throttle engages and the brakes won't override. The result is you can get "ass launched" into traffic; sometimes the front wheel...

Some throttles are very cheap.. It could be a shorted throttle which would cause the bike to lurch or stay at full power. Obviously if you are dead nothing is going to help you; but when you buy an ebike you should do so from a company that can stand behind it from a liability perspective...

You could have a short in the throttle..

http://mauinow.com/2015/10/19/lahaina-man-succumbs-to-injuries-in-deadly-ebike-crash/ There was a death on a Sondors bike. Odds are that this guy was drunk or on drugs. However, since Sondors is judgement proof (and does not carry insurance) there is no recourse if Sondors contributed to...