Search results

sick!!!!! sign me up

definitely a design flaw....working with them on it now. don't remove links because the tension is only necessary on the top of the chain which is fine...its going to take an additional spacer of some kind

curious, where have you seen them?

The truth is...if you like the bike you are going to end up upgrading it yourself...with that said the first generation bikes were 1000 on Kickstarter....I would say 800 is fair....just my 2 cents

The frame is actually a little different and the controller is smaller...also the front wheel has a quick disconnect....

There is actually quite a few differences...there is a list on this forum

so just so I am clear the 52v worked without issue?....thanks

this is a design flaw on RR. The chain is simply out of alignment. if you have it in first the angle to the crank is just too severe...put it in first and look straight down at the chain line from above... the best fix is a 3mm spacer at the chain wheel

wont fir RR does not have a tapered neck and its offset is too wide

Do you see any gains? Torque or top speed?

please let me know how the 52v works after install..many thanks

Lol...it's not, just a little more about the principle of keeping it in tact the way it was designed.

Makes sense....thanks for the reply

Ha! Sick! I actually have a stealth bomber so the RR is really just to putt around but I really wish I could get a little more top end out of the thing without dropping another 750 into it....any thoughts?

Many thanks!

neal what fenders do you have? Thanks

There has to be a speed hack for the RR....the drivetrain is clearly governed....any thoughts/info?

Does anybody know if this controller will work for a RR (Link Removed - No Longer Exists)