Search results

not what I'm saying You're just accusing people of doing something that you do all the time out here. You're casting the first stone. it's all right there because you're on the right side correct? You have the certainty of Osama bin laden. How many other kind of websites are you on like this...

Barry I will give you this you are entertaining. You call people insecure and accuse them of being like a child. The last post I just read you were calling whole groups of people liars. There you are casting the first stone..... bahahaha.

Before they told you? Oh okay I got you. I still get takeout. I will assume that you were being sarcastic with saying it was done forever for you but that's fine. I know this is where we point out where not everybody got 100% of everything right so therefore we're all equally wrong regarding...

I think it's great that this whole conversation started with a fellow traveler discussing playing golf and having a bite after

Exactly so there is no difference between us and the tree frog.

There is no truth, it's all opinion so that way everyone can believe what they want. As my russian handler taught me....

Figuring out that probability is a bit too much for a dummy like me but I'm sure the possibility exists. Alright time for a bit if family time, everyone have a good night, cheers!

I don't know either way, you could very likely be an imbecile.

Exactly. We don't "share 98% of our DNA" with chimps, it's 98% similar. Also genes can be more turned on then others or even dormant.

Monty python?

What do you mean by enjoy life?

How do you mean? Am I your biology teacher? One would imagine there are varying degrees, as one harmful mutation could be more harmful than others or one more helpful than others. There are genes that make you more likely to get a disease or a condition but not necessarily bad enough to kill...

Honestly not sure. My son only got it recently and we've only had it out twice. Next time it warms up a bit I plan on checking

I'm not talking down to you, why would I assume you knew the subject at hand ? I don't know you. I said perhaps I was wrong in that assumption.

It's simple he will say those Churches aren't the real deal......

But a population is "a group of people with a defining characteristic" so the only way 1 person can be considered a population for the sake of this discussion is if you consider 1 to be a group.

I already knew, I assumed you didn't. Perhaps I was wrong.

Whatever you prefer.is one a group? ...... Hail to the chief.....

Even then it doesn't mean fixed as on permanent. It means it's an established part of the species

There is no standard minimum. It's a group of people with a defining characteristic.