Search results

Powerme obviously my repetitive posts have yet to sink in - my grudge and primary focus is on the false claims and misleading advertising and we don't need to wait until whenever to work that one out do we?

So what you are effectively saying is that if I want to complain about misleading specs and false statements in this campaign, for those complaints to be accurate or observant I have to also comment on other campaigns which do not interest me and I never approached to buy multiple bikes from or...

Lol I always have been a determined kind of guy - this Campaign and the tactics of yours truly is like a red rag to a bull. Some claim they are ebike experts and because I am a novice in this industry (by way of inference) I should not be commenting on these misleading claims. I hope that in a...

Court hasn't shut down this thread. a Campaign Owner has overall control of what is claimed for his product whether he employs an Agency or not. My primary focus has been on the misleading claims made about this bike. I believe it is foolish to assume that everyone knows these figures are...

Agree, well some of the contributors are being screwed, not those self-professed bike experts who try and justify the silly claims that even a novice like me researched and saw through to encourage/reassure contributors who have pledged in good faith. I have been accused of being paid by...

I guess when you don't intent to pay the recipient who is legally entitled to those funds? So if a Campaign Owner shits on a firm pretty much solely responsible for a wildly successful IGG Campaign in terms of fundraising, contributors can rest easy in the knowledge that asides from a worthless...

The Contract between Agency 2.0 and Sondors on my reading appears to be fairly basic and limited, but payments were made and cheques were bounced and a contract did exist between the parties. What sort of gutless Justice system is it that cannot enforce payment? Seems incredible that the...

If I had done the work that Agency 2.0 had and had cheques bounced on me I would crucify Sondors in a Court - double-edged sword for me, Olenik lied to mislead people that he was I aware I was paid by Prodeco to damage the Campaign and was taking action so I would like to see him have something...

"we get it, you guys are smart" was the comment that irked me. Obviously you are smarter, I took a few days of researching and considering the merits of the Campaign before I decided it stunk. If any of my posts have come over as patronising, I apologise.

@pxpaulx - I don't believe I have been patronising, if I have come over that way I apologise - why is being a funder a back-handed insult given that my FB page is designed to help and inform the very people who have been misled due to no fault of their own? Nowhere else in business would any...

Why are contributors feeling bad enough? The message doesn't seem to be getting through to most people. Happy to engage in discussion, but not when you post patronising stuff - are you a funder @Hurley ?

Hmmmm, ask for your money-back or take the risk that you will lose everything and be left with nothing... some people will still keep their hand in, personally I am glad I never invested but it quickly became apparent that this was no oridnarily-run show, highly suspect from the start - the...

I am inclined to agree, what bothers me is the blind justification/excuses that is given for anything Ivars does or doesn't do by a few fanboys...

Putting aside all other matters, in a communication age, the lack of clarity, communication and consistency is alarming; it simply indicates that this Campaign is far from professional and for this and other reasons, totally untrustworthy. In any other other industry, a gaurantee of less than...

@PowerMe Something has been lost in translation, there is no concerted campaign by me, I did say the above and I stick by it, but it isn't like I set time aside to attack the Sondors campaign, I am a passionate person with a genuine interest as to how this turns out I have no commercial...

@stevenast I agree. Anyone who had faith in a product they were taking to market would have made it available for the bike press to review as part of the Campaign launch - why didn't Sondors? There were two bikes at the one and only "demo" day but one bike was made available and you were not...

Surely Courts' job or at least his focus is to review bikes independently and impartially and I would expect him to do no less once or if he receives his bike - my experience of life has taught me to trust two things only - dogs and intuition. There will be another sting in the tail in this...

@stevenast I don't think it matters what the result of any review would be, Sondors has the money of funders and that is that,did you see how the sale of the bikes progressively stalled, they hardly sold any bikes in the second wave at $649 honestly, to suggest Sondors will be trying to sell at...

I have just sold my 2nd BMW Cruise ebike, on Monday I will deliver it - YAY Ian 2 Sondors 0

Point taken, s*it happens - so where is the honesty and transparency.... I get it all the time on IGG, people saying they will be gloating when they get to ride their Sondors in the Summer............. if it is delivered by then............ and if the battery lasts that long for them to gloat...