Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Ebike Reviews
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Members
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
mcdenny's latest activity
mcdenny
replied to the thread
Turbo Vado 2 4.0 or 5.0 or 6.0?
.
New info regarding efficiency. Thanks @mschwett for suggesting getting a lot more low cadence 100/100 data. Big surprise to me anyway...
Yesterday at 4:50 PM
mcdenny
replied to the thread
Turbo Vado 2 4.0 or 5.0 or 6.0?
.
Not at all, just ride the brakes.
Yesterday at 4:44 PM
mcdenny
replied to the thread
Turbo Vado 2 4.0 or 5.0 or 6.0?
.
The Spec mechanical power vs cadence is significantly curved. If you accept that the electrical power input is constant across the same...
Yesterday at 8:14 AM
mcdenny
replied to the thread
Turbo Vado 2 4.0 or 5.0 or 6.0?
.
You can see the spec chart has a good bit more curvature. I did my best to match the spec chart in my spreadsheet to figure out an...
Thursday at 5:14 PM
mcdenny
replied to the thread
Turbo Vado 2 4.0 or 5.0 or 6.0?
.
For reference here's the Spec charts for torque and Mechanical power
Thursday at 5:08 PM
mcdenny
replied to the thread
Turbo Vado 2 4.0 or 5.0 or 6.0?
.
I haven't tried that experiment but your statement is correct - It isn't designed to work at that low rpm that means it's less efficient...
Thursday at 5:04 PM
mcdenny
replied to the thread
Turbo Vado 2 4.0 or 5.0 or 6.0?
.
A short progress report: Here's how often a record occurred for a particular cadence. 0-10 have been deleted. (O was far and away the...
Thursday at 2:01 PM
mcdenny
replied to the thread
Turbo Vado 2 4.0 or 5.0 or 6.0?
.
Worked some on starting over with freshly downloaded data. The stats from 27 rides (48 miles, 3.5 hours) are smushed into a spreadsheet...
Wednesday at 8:55 PM
mcdenny
replied to the thread
Turbo Vado 2 4.0 or 5.0 or 6.0?
.
Jeremy: Q1. Yes, micro tune in all cases except the 100/40 ride which I don’t think I presented yet. For 100/40 I set “sport” to 100/40...
Wednesday at 7:49 AM
mcdenny
replied to the thread
Turbo Vado 2 4.0 or 5.0 or 6.0?
.
Another idea I have is that maybe the ramp functions should be forced to intersect Pr=0 at Pm=0. As I was analyzing the rides from...
Tuesday at 2:59 PM
mcdenny
replied to the thread
Turbo Vado 2 4.0 or 5.0 or 6.0?
.
@mschwett , you were asking about Pmax at 80 cadence. Here's a chart from my 100/100 segment that shows the average and maximum Pm...
Tuesday at 2:27 PM
mcdenny
replied to the thread
Turbo Vado 2 4.0 or 5.0 or 6.0?
.
Hooray, all the rides download using the ride.specialized.com browser link. It just the phone app that is buggy.
Tuesday at 2:21 PM
mcdenny
replied to the thread
Turbo Vado 2 4.0 or 5.0 or 6.0?
.
I did three more test rides this afternoon. 5 minutes at 100/40, 20/100 and 30 minutes ar 20/20. Unfortunately I could not download any...
Monday at 9:10 PM
mcdenny
replied to the thread
Turbo Vado 2 4.0 or 5.0 or 6.0?
.
Jeremy, I eliminated all records with cadence < 60. The data at low power, low cadence is very noisy. Most of the records are in the...
Monday at 8:58 PM
mcdenny
replied to the thread
Turbo Vado 2 4.0 or 5.0 or 6.0?
.
A new trial, a little longer and with more rider effort to more clearly define Pm saturation values. I just did 40/40 and 40/100...
Monday at 2:04 PM
Members
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.
Accept
Learn More…
Back